Helm on Piper, Wright, and the Need for Theological Distinctions

Paul Helm has a new post online, looking at John Piper’s The Future of Justification. Here is his summary:

The first is to draw attention to what I believe is one of the most
significant methodological points that Piper makes, but one which may,
in the flurry of interest about justification, and the dust raised by
it, get overlooked. The second thing is to underline what Piper says
about the ambiguity of some of Bishop Wright’s language about
imputation and justification. What both of these have in common is that
Piper shows us the need to observe theological distinctions.